• Some of the links on this forum allow SMF, at no cost to you, to earn a small commission when you click through and make a purchase. Let me know if you have any questions about this.

Rectangular RF Smoker from Holland (Europe)

SmokingMeatForums.com is reader supported and as an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.

Dutch_Erik

Newbie
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Messages
24
Reaction score
2
Location
Netherlands, Europe
Hi all! As posted in Roll Call, I'm planning to build an offset, reverse flow smoker. This'll be a family project for me and my dad. Neither of us currently knows how to weld, so that's the first step in what will surely be a great project.

Meanwhile, I am working on the design. As stated in the title, this will be a rectangular, offset, reverse flow smoker. The choice for rectangular is based on personal taste and local availability of materials.

Using the excellent tutorial on this forum, I have come up with the following dimensions (pardon the metric system):
  • Cooking chamber dimensions: 120cm x 50cm x 50cm = 300 liters = 18307 in3
  • Minimum firebox volume (above the grate): 300 * 0.33 = 100 litres
  • RF channel area (oversized by 30% due to small cooker volume) = 18310 * 0.004 * 1.3 = 95 in2 = 620cm2
  • RF channel height = 620cm2 / 50cm (cooker depth) = 12.4 cm minimal height
  • Exhaust stack volume (above CC) = 18310 * 0.022 (oversized 30%) = 403in3 = 6.6 litres
  • Exhaust stack optimal height = 36" = 91cm
  • Exhaust stack dimensions: height (above CC) = 85cm, diameter = 10cm (i.d.), volume = 6.7 litres
If anyone has a spare moment, please check if my calculations are correct. I tried to convert most things between metric and US units for easier reading...

One question I already have now; would it hurt or help to take the stack to exactly 36", making it approximately 10% oversized (on top of the +30% already incorporated for the lower volume)?

Thanks for reading :)
 
hi. Metric is no problem for me. Always better to er on the side of bigger if in doubt. Especially with a small cooker.
A local sheet metal place should be able to cut and bend what you need.
 
hi. Metric is no problem for me. Always better to er on the side of bigger if in doubt. Especially with a small cooker.
A local sheet metal place should be able to cut and bend what you need.
Thanks for the feedback :) what do you think of the dimensions I posted?
 
May I suggest, you convert all of your metric numbers to inches and then run the numbers... I'm getting some discrepancy in the numbers..
 
May I suggest, you convert all of your metric numbers to inches and then run the numbers... I'm getting some discrepancy in the numbers..

Ok, here goes:
  • Cooking chamber dimensions: 47.17" x 19.7" x 19.7" = 18307 cubic inch (in3)
  • Minimum firebox volume (above the grate): 18307 * 0.33 = 6041 in3
  • RF channel area (oversized by 30% due to small cooker volume) = 18310 * 0.004 * 1.3 = 95 sq. inch (in2)
  • RF channel height = 95 in2 / 19.7" (cooker depth) = 4.8" minimal height
  • Exhaust stack volume (above CC) = 18310 * 0.022 (oversized 30%) = 403in3
  • Exhaust stack optimal height = 36"
  • Exhaust stack dimensions: height (above CC) = 33", diameter = 4" (i.d.), volume = 415 in3
Thanks for reading :)
 
Diameter X Diameter X 0.7854 X Length = Volume in cubic inches

I come up with....
19.7 X 19.7 X 0.7854 X 47.17 = 14,378 cu. in.

I don't know where you are going wrong ????
 
Aaah, hang on, I see what's happening here ;) I'm building a rectangular smoker, not a round one.
Therefore I am calculating volume by multiplying width x depth x height.
 
Without going through the other numbers, I'm going to say you've got it...
 
So, the build will end up looking vaguely similar to this: (image off google)
DSCN3062-s-279x300.jpg


Still horizontal, but with a rectangular cooking chamber and firebox. Reason for this is because large pipes and/or propane tanks are not a common sight over here, so sheet metal is easier to source.
 
I would shorten the stack a little. Looks long and thin in the sketch. It will draw fine being a little shorter.
 
I would shorten the stack a little. Looks long and thin in the sketch. It will draw fine being a little shorter.

Currently it's pretty close to the recommended 36" above the CC. It's 90x90mm outside dimension, 4mm wall thickness.

I calculated the difference in internal surface area between a round and square pipe, and increased the internal volume of the stack by 15% to compensate for the extra friction loss.
 
You can buy steel in 90x90mm in Holland? Personally I would use 100x100 and 3.2mm (1/8) is plenty for a stack. Your firebox is mounted low and is a tall shape already so you will have good natural air flow through the smoker as well. my 2 cents.
 
You can buy steel in 90x90mm in Holland?

This comment made me double-check my measurements, turns out there was a mistake in the calculations somewhere!
A 100x100mm stack is the minimum needed, which would come to roughly the same height as the sketch shows. Next bigger option is 120x120mm...

Thanks for the input :)
 
SmokingMeatForums.com is reader supported and as an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.
SmokingMeatForums.com is reader supported and as an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.

Latest posts

Back
Top
Clicky