How about the cooking quality of the Akorn vs a much more expensive ceramic cooler? Obviously you get what you pay for and I don't expect the two to be in the same league but is the Akorn worth buying or am I better or holding off and saving or a much more expensive ceramic cooker?
The cooking quality is very similar but a ceramic grill will have the edge. The
Akorn is so efficient that it has very little airflow through the grill, when doing slow temp cooks. I think this is why a ceramic gives a little better smoke flavor when doing low and slow. There is also the rust factor. No matter how well you take care of it it is only going to last for a few years, before the rust will take over. I have had my
Akorn about 4 years now and I take good care of it and always keep it covered when not in use. I don't know if it will make it through the summer. I still use mine, even with the Big Joe because it does have it's advantages. I use it mainly for high temp searing, regular grilling, when I need more space for big cooks and Pizza cooks now. It uses much less lump than the BJ and comes up to temp quicker also, doesn't have to heat soak all that ceramic. When I am doing reverse sear steaks, I will do the low temp portion on the BJ and have the
Akorn going for the searing portion. A Weber kettle grill grate will sit on the flanges for the diffuser stone and lets you get real close to the coals for searing.
I have a large extended family and in the summer I am cooking for large groups almost every weekend. I use all my grills sometimes, so when my
Akorn gives up the battle I will most likely replace it with another one, instead of getting another Kamado Joe, just do to the cost factor. I would recommend getting an Akorn and enjoying all the great food it will cook and if you decide you really like kamado cooking, then save up and get a good ceramic grill.