This is starting to make me wonder how long this technology has been in use, or at least been on the drawing boards. It's a similar concept to the screw-type log splitters (minus the cutting paddles) that have been around for 25 or so years, which are far more efficient than a hydraulic ram type splitter. We used a ram splitter that we home-built and mounted on a 3-point hitch...worked OK, but green wood could cause hang-ups when it wouldn't fully split...maybe not the best ram splitter design, but worked for most of our wood splitting. The main drawback to the screw splitters I've seen was no uniformity in splitting size, and multiple splits from the same piece was difficult. Oh, that and they were slow if you had a low-volume pump to operate the ones with a hydraulic motor...some were direct PTO driven...non-reversible being one set-back, and lack of good speed control being another. Off topic there...
The stump busting rig in the video appears to have approx 34-36" diameter sweep (maybe bigger) with the paddle cutters and could probably handle a stump three times the diameter they demonstrated it with, if worked with multiple entry points...maybe 8-9ft diameter...get a little more creative and start thinking about 12ft+ diameter. That said, a rig 1/3-1/2 that size could likely handle a 6ft+ stump with a determined and properly trained operator. That would open things up for more affordability and feasibility to owners of smaller tractors. If this is a useful tool for you, but far too large, I bet some digging around on the net will find you a smaller one, and maybe it won't even break the bank. If you're ambitious, build one...finding a compact gear-case stout enough to handle all that torque being the biggest hurdle, IMHO. Then, there's drive type...do you want direct PTO drive (non-reversing) or a hydraulic motor (reversible), and then figure out what ratio in the final drive gear-case. Ah, I'm rambling now...getting late and I'm tired...carry on.
Eric