1. Some of the links on this forum allow SMF, at no cost to you, to earn a small commission when you click through and make a purchase. Let me know if you have any questions about this.

Iridescence in Raw and Cooked Meats

By pops6927, Feb 13, 2013 | |
  1. IRIDESCENCE IN RAW AND COOKED MEATS
    Erwin Waters
    Waters and Associates
    Boca Raton, Florida

    Iridescence in meats, specifically beef, can be detected in some of the muscle tissues of some animals before and after rigor mortis. It is most common in the muscles comprising the round, navel and brisket.

    The type of light and the angle of the light reflecting off the muscle will have an effect on the visual brightness of the various iridescent colors. The most common color is an iridescent green, with the next most common color an iridescent orange-red.

    Very limited research has been done on the iridescence in both raw and cooked beef, and that which was conducted did not lead to any specific causes or conclusions. There has been no specific proof, or even connection, between the usage of phosphates and the appearance of the iridescent areas in the muscles of cooked cured or uncured meats.

    Once iridescence is present in a muscle, it can not be removed with any of the processes commonly used for the preparation and cooking of solid muscle meats.

    Due to the fact that the iridescence is directly associated with the reflectance of light from the meat surface, the color of the meat, it's surface condition, the type of light reflecting from the surface and the angle at which the light is hitting the surface, the condition of the meat will have an effect on the intensity of the iridescence. Smooth surfaced meats will show iridescence more vividly than meats with rough surfaces, and dark colored meats will reduce the intensity.

    It is primarily for these reasons that cooked cured meats, whose color is brighter than uncured meats, will show the iridescence more vividly. The addition of phosphates to curing solutions enhances moisture retention, which allows the surface of the meat to retain a smoother texture. Tumbling of the meats after injection or marinading, releases a sufficient amount of proteins, which fills the voids between muscle fibers, increasing reflectance and thus increasing the intensity of the iridescent.

    Cooking to higher temperatures, or for longer periods of time, will soften the connective tissue, increase moisture losses and cause the muscle fibers to shrink. When the meat is cut with a knife, or slicer, the surface of the meat will not be as smooth, decreasing it's reflectance, which in turn reduce the intensity of the iridescence.

    Even though iridescence is a natural occurring factor, and does not effect the quality or the palatability of the meat, it is not acceptable to the consumer, and the consumer perceives the iridescent colors as spoilage, primarily because of the greenish hues. Meat muscles that have a structure in which the muscle fibers run parallel to each other and need to be sliced perpendicular to the length of the muscle fiber, will show the iridescence more vividly than those meats whose muscle fibers run in various directions to each other, and which can be sliced at an angle or parallel to the direction of the muscle fiber.

    Present merchandising, primarily for product cost, demands that many of the processes that enhance the reflectance of the meat surface, need to be included in the process. Eliminating those meat pieces that show iridescence before they are processed is an almost impossible task, many pieces of meat in which iridescence was not noticeable when in the raw state, will end up showing iridescence after processing and slicing.

    At the present time there does not seem to be an acceptable solution to this problem. Due to the fact that under usual circumstances iridescence is only apparent in a few pieces of meat in a processing batch, additional cooking, with the additional cooking losses, would be more costly than having to accept returns of pieces that show the iridescence very vividly.

    Even though it has not been determined if handling practices during or after slaughtering has any effect on the possibility of iridescence, periodically meats from some packing houses seems to present this problem more often. If iridescence is a major problem, or tends to increase, it is suggested that comparisons be tested on meats from other sources. If a change in processing was instituted, which includes a change in non-meat ingredients used in the brine, and iridescence increases, and if more than one change was made at one time in the process, to determine which change in the process could be responsible, tests should be conducted with each change separately applied.

    There is no magic cure, the best that can be done is to minimize the problem with the suggestions given.

    From: OSU Meat Science

    Share This Article

Comments

To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!
  1. fpmich
    No science here,
    but I remember a few years (20-30) ago, supermarkets used to always put "almost outdated" meat in a special bin. Called it Manager special, or some such thing. Most of the markets always had one small section reserved for meat close to use by date, AND marked WAY down from normal. Over 1/2 off.
     
    I always went to, and bought from, that bin first, if they had what I wanted! Used to get some good aged porterhouse and ribeye steaks with that greenish tinge for 1/2 or less, than normal.
    I can still hear a young girl who checked me out one time saying, " Oooh! That's green. It's no good!"  "You sure you want it?" Yes, I replied. You are just too young too enjoy good meat. It's more tender and has more flavor when it's green. Of course this was also when most markets still had meat in chilled air coolers, instead of plastic. They mostly only wrapped them when necessary. Now all the markets around me don't do that anymore. Sigh... I always shopped that bin first.
     
    Yes, I'll eat green meat, if I can find it.
  2. largeneal
    So this summary (which, of significant note, had NO experimental data attached, nor could I find any in that NIH archives), seems to make its conclusions from someone else's data (specifically a guy names Howard Swatland, who seems to be the world's leading expert on this topic). He's published a bunch in a journal called Meat Science (I'm telling you, journals exist for EVERYTHING). It doesn't look like he has the answer, BUT he's doing some molecular level work to try to figure out what's going on. His last one dealt with a part of the muscle cells called sarcomere disks (sarcomeres hold the cell's calcium, probably the most important ion for muscle contraction) and how they interfere with light.
    Some people may have drawn the conclusion that, "hey, if I leave an apple or potato or guacamole sitting out, it also changes color!" Yes. Why? Oxygen (which is a very powerful, reactive molecule found everywhere) and enzymes in these food items cause a color change. Not real harmful, but a distinct texture difference. If I were to speculate, beef has proteins, including collagen, which are prone to forming complexes. So this beef gets exposed to oxygen, the collagen (or maybe some other protein) undergoes a slight change, and voila, something has happened structurally that alters the way light reflects.
    Scientifically, this article sucked, but information wise, it was really interesting and informative. I still won't buy green meat, though :).
    -nmr