• Some of the links on this forum allow SMF, at no cost to you, to earn a small commission when you click through and make a purchase. Let me know if you have any questions about this.

Lump vs Briq's in long smokes

nwdave

Master of the Pit
SMF Premier Member
1,590
20
Joined Dec 9, 2009
Finally starting to get things figured out in the charcoal arena.  I have a new Weber 22.5 OTG and got the grilling and indirect smoking worked out. 

 Do have a question though:  In a vertical smoker like a WSM, would you necessarily use lump in smokes lasting much longer than 5 hours?  I'd think briq's would work better in some minion or other long burning start up.

~Dave
 

ak1

Master of the Pit
OTBS Member
2,374
70
Joined Feb 23, 2010
Personally, I don't like briquettes, regardless. There is way too much ash left behind. I've tried the typical crappy Kingsford and Royal Oak and other stuff with no additives but wheat starch for binding.

IMO they all suck.

I do 20+ hr smokes with one load of natural lump in my UDS with no problems.

Why someone would want to use a product that is made up of ground up charcoal. coal dust, ground limestone, and other additives is beyond me.
 

SmokinAl

SMF Hall of Fame Pitmaster
Staff member
Moderator
OTBS Member
★ Lifetime Premier ★
44,442
6,173
Joined Jun 22, 2009
Well I have used both and because the blue bag is cheaper than lump that's what I use. I find no difference in taste or in the length of time I get out of 1 full charcoal ring. The WSM has a large area under the grate for ash. If you dump it out after each smoke there is plenty of room there for a full load of ash. I have gone 20 hours on 1 load of Kingsford blue without losing temp. or having too much ash buildup. The only lump around here is RO, and I do use it for grilling steaks because it burns hotter and really sears the steak well. I smoke a lot & I would rather save a little on charcoal and spend it on a better cut of meat. That's just my 2 cents.
 

ak1

Master of the Pit
OTBS Member
2,374
70
Joined Feb 23, 2010
In my neck of the woods there is minimal price difference between the various brands and types of charcoal. That's probably why I dislike briquettes so much. If the price difference was more substantial I would be more forgiving of the briquettes. Around here Kingsford briquettes or lump. Royal Oak Briquettes or lump, Maple Leaf lump & Basques pure sugar maple lump are all between 14-15 bucks for 20 lb of fuel.
 

jirodriguez

Master of the Pit
OTBS Member
SMF Premier Member
4,653
138
Joined Jun 5, 2009
With the WSM's one of the big factors is how well you can pack the lump into the ring, if it isn't packed tightly you get a lot of airflow in the stack that can run you out of fuel faster - remember the WSM's don't seal 100% so there comes a point where even with dampers closed you can't reduce the airflow.

Briquets stack very even and burn very even, but produce a lot more ash - but like Al said the 22.5" WSM can handle a lot of ash without any problem.

Personally I use lump for any smoke under 10 hrs. or so, then if I plan an all nighter with butts or brisket then I use briquets. When using briquets when you get past the 12 hr. mark make sure you go out and gently stir them every 2 hrs or so to knock the ash off the outside. This will allow you to go 20+ hrs. at a steady 200-220° in a WSM.
 

SmokinAl

SMF Hall of Fame Pitmaster
Staff member
Moderator
OTBS Member
★ Lifetime Premier ★
44,442
6,173
Joined Jun 22, 2009
There's a huge difference here AK. I get 46 lbs. (2-23 lb bags) of Kingsford blue bag for $17. RO lump is $8 for a 10 lb. bag. That's the biggest bag anyone around here carries. If they had big bags of lump, maybe the price would come down.
 

ak1

Master of the Pit
OTBS Member
2,374
70
Joined Feb 23, 2010
Wow!!! At that price, I'd probably use Kingsford as well, and live with the ash.
 

flbobecu

Smoking Fanatic
306
11
Joined May 11, 2010
Only reason I use lump in my smoker, is because I can close down the vents completely, and save lump. Whereas briquettes once lit, break apart and are unusable. While I pay nearly twice as much for lump, the stuff I use, literally last forever, and I'm able to save lump.

The long lasting ability, and ability to save burned lump equals the playing field in my smoker. Plus lump is all natural.
 

will85w4

Newbie
9
10
Joined Mar 22, 2011
I have also ran into this same dilemma.  Briq's or lump?  Only problem is lump is really only sold at Lowes or Home Depot.  The grocery stores carry Best of the West lump, but it's a very small bag of maybe 6-8lbs for about $5 - $6.  I have a Char-Broil AGD offset smoker.  I recently found Stubb's All Natural briquettes at Lowes.com for $4.25 for a 15lb bag.  I bought five bags for about $23 after taxes.  They seem to work ok, however, produce a lot of ash and smoke even more.  I have already gone through 2 bags of it in only two smokes (one six hr rib smoke, and one 5 hr chicken smoke)
 

ecto1

Master of the Pit
OTBS Member
Group Lead
2,133
28
Joined Feb 22, 2010
I have used both and prefer lump nut will use briquttes when i have to.  I like frontier lump but have been hard pressed to find it this spring.  I may have to go to Royal Oak Lump from Wally word.
 

papad

Smoke Blower
89
11
Joined Apr 7, 2009
  I like frontier lump but have been hard pressed to find it this spring.  I may have to go to Royal Oak Lump from Wally word.
I really like the Frontier also. If you have a Sam's Club in your area, they usually carry it, at least ours does. They carry it in the forty pound bags for about $15.
 
 

venture

Smoking Guru
OTBS Member
6,961
72
Joined Aug 1, 2008
The lump we refer to is a natural wood charcoal.

Good luck and good smoking.
 

Hot Threads

Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected

We noticed that you're using an ad-blocker, which could block some critical website features. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.