Some of the links on this forum allow SMF, at no cost to you, to earn a small commission when you click through and make a purchase. Let me know if you have any questions about this.
this guy from 2014 (link) says there are chemicals in the ember charcoals to help them light faster. does anyone think he's wrong? having used Embers only once, i did notice a different smell (compared to kingsford) that i'm now wondering if it's the chemicals he's talking about. or my nose doesn't know what's what.
Well its not a great article to start with, and I haven't really noticed a smell... but I will say they stay hotter longer and produce less ash than kingsford in my own experience. That being said I did pick up a couple bags of Kingsford Professional before I bought the Embers and that rocked, but not for the price for the size 11lbs.
i sent an email to royal-oak asking about any chemicals in their charcoal, and here is their response:
"Thank you for contacting us. Our charcoal does not contain any chemicals. It is the product of a proprietary recipe consisting primarily of hardwood char and food starch. Hopefully, this information was helpful.
Consumer Affairs
Royal Oak Enterprises"
If you light up a few briqs of KBB and whiff the blue smoke, then do the same thing with a few briqs of RO Ridge (or Embers), you'll notice how much more acrid smelling the KBB is than Ridge. KBB cannot make the same no chemicals statement as Ridge.