You definetly stated it much more elegant than I did...I believe we are on the same page as to what the settings are doing on each device and their respective impact. I agree that the RFX Meat Probes were sending the once/minute given the lack of temperature change. I don't see anyway to increase the interval/reduce the number of transmission from the RFX meat probe.
With that in mind I am only seeing 8 - 12 hours out of the probes.
1. Not seeing anywhere close to 60 hours batterly life they claim on a full charge.
2. Not sure why there is a 50% difference in battery life on the probes - they are brand new.
Am I missing a setting somewhere?
Is measuring air temperature at releatively consistent temperature a valid test?
Don
I heard back from
Thermoworks support today, saddly, I don't think it is good news. I have also found some additional software bugs. I have found 5 or 6 bugs so far and have confirmed the RFX Meat Thermometers are not working as promised. I would really like to see someone test and share the results of the battery life with their probes.
From
Thermoworks
"I appreciate all the testing you've done with your probes already. If you're willing, we'd also like to get the serial numbers of all four probes for our Product Development team.
Our Product Development team is actively looking into your issue and it will take them a few business days to resolve it.
To answer your basic questions:
1- The battery life duration you experienced is abnormal given the conditions of your testing.
2- That is a fair test.
3- There is not a transmission setting that you're missing."
I had done another test on Sunday and shared the following data with them.
Probe, Setting, Start of test, End of test/inactive due to dead battery, Serial#, Events, Readings, Other
1, 1, 9:06:58 AM 10:21:53 PM, M100006599, 2 - identical, 3955, Low battery alert has a date of January 20 at 6:44:44 PM
2, 1.5, 9:07:13 AM, 6:25:41 PM, M100009080, 2 – identical, 2700, Low battery alert before pulling it out of the charger 4:34:40 PM , changed to Jan 20 6:44:33PM when looking at history within session. Suspect this happened to all of them.
3, 2, 9:07:05 AM, 6:36:30 PM, M100006601, 2 - identical, 2725, Low battery alert has a date of January 20 at6:44:33 PM
4, 3, 9:06:50 AM, 9:21:16 PM, M100006598, 2 – identical, 3540, Low battery alert has a date of January 20 at 6:44:42 PM
My interpretation...
The number of readings being sent seems excessive, also if the number of readings dictates how long the batteries are going to last, it looks like there are some significant differences based on serial number - m100006598 and ...6599 provided a higher number of readings and lasted longer.
The session data while it is active and/or has ran out of battery will report a different date and time then when the session is recognized as ended (in the case of a battery dying it needs to charge and then be pulled out of the charger), at that point it assigned January 20 and what looks like a sequential time stamp to me - each probe alert was incremented by 1 second on that alert time stamp when looked at in history. When the session was active it was reporting the correct time and date for the alert.
At the moment, my first impressions is much less than satisfactory. I went with the RFX pre-buy the day it came out, was litterally going to pull the trigger on a Smoke X because I want the range. Wishing I had gone with the Smoke and waited at this point. I have some long cooks and smokes coming uo for holidays and the thermometers as they are currently workinig will not meet my need. Customer support has been great! Product development and testing leave a bit to be desired.
Don