Multiple multistate Salmonella outbreaks with multiple serotypes due to backyard flocks

  • Some of the links on this forum allow SMF, at no cost to you, to earn a small commission when you click through and make a purchase. Let me know if you have any questions about this.
SmokingMeatForums.com is reader supported and as an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.

daveomak.fs

Master of the Pit
Original poster
SMF Premier Member
Apr 11, 2018
1,560
279
Omak, Washington
backyardflocks_1200x680-550x312.jpg

Multiple multistate Salmonella outbreaks with multiple serotypes due to backyard flocks
By Dan Flynn on July 25, 2019


The July report for backyard poultry was bleak for the adults and children who care for them.

The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta reports that since June 13 it added 489 patients and eight states to the Salmonella outbreaks associated with backyard chicken flocks.

With the July totals added in, the backyard poultry flocks are responsible for multiple national outbreaks totaling 768 confirmed Salmonella cases across 48 of the 50 states. CDC also reports the ongoing continuing outbreaks are responsible for two deaths and have seen at least 122 people admitted to hospitals. Texas and Ohio each recorded one death associated with the outbreak.

CDC added five additional bugs to the list of involved pathogens. The Salmonella serotypes involved include Agona, Alachua, Anatum, Braenderup, Enteritidis, Infantis, Manhattan, Montevideo, Muenchen, Newport, and Oranienburg.

Epidemiologic and laboratory evidence indicate that contact with backyard poultry, such as chicks and ducklings, from multiple hatcheries, are the likely source of these outbreaks.

In interviews, CDC found 237, or 75 percent, of 315 ill people reported contact with chicks or ducklings. People reported getting chicks and ducklings from several sources, including agricultural stores, websites, and hatcheries.

Five of the outbreak strains making people sick were in samples collected from backyard poultry environments in four states. The sampling was from backyard poultry environments in ill people’s homes in California and Ohio and from retail poultry environments in Michigan and Oregon.

The nation’s premiere disease laboratory reports that regardless of where poultry is purchased, they can carry Salmonella germs that can make people sick. It says backyard poultry owners should always follow steps to stay healthy around their poultry.

Meanwhile, it is clear the multiple multistate outbreaks of Salmonella from backyard flocks is not over. Public health investigators are using the PulseNet system to identify illnesses that may be part of these outbreaks.

PulseNet is the national subtyping network of public health laboratories coordinated by CDC. DNA fingerprinting is performed on Salmonella bacteria isolated from ill people by using techniques called pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole genome sequencing (WGS).

CDC’s PulseNet manages a national database of these DNA fingerprints to identify possible outbreaks. WGS gives a more detailed DNA fingerprint than PFGE. WGS performed on Salmonella from ill people in this outbreak showed that they are closely related genetically. This means that the ill people are more likely to share a common source of infection.

WGS analysis of 117 isolates from ill people predicted antibiotic resistance to one or more of the following drugs: amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin, cefoxitin, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, fosfomycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Testing of 5 isolates using standard antibiotic susceptibility testing by CDC’s National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) laboratory confirmed these results (fosfomycin and kanamycin were not tested by this method). If antibiotics are needed, this resistance profile may affect the choice of antibiotic.

To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)
 
So are the suppliers of chicks and ducklings the main culprit here? Or are they trying to start down the slope of regulating home small flocks of poultry?

If 75% of those infected had been exposed to chicks or ducklings from hatcheries, websites and ag stores, it sounds like the commercial production sources is the problem. To play the devils advocate here, even the other 25% of cases from existing home flocks may have had the initial source brought in with hatchlings from commercial production and the adult birds were now carriers.

I get concerned when it starts to sound like small personal farms are becoming a target (no, I don't have any poultry - but my grandfater ran a hobby farm when I was growing up eons ago, and I loved helping every summer).
 
SmokingMeatForums.com is reader supported and as an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.

Similar threads

Clicky