Just wondering if I could use choke cherry wood for smoking? It has been dead for 3-4 years but it has not been cut down. I may even be willing to trade for another type of wood. thanks for helping.
Yes you sure can..
Most ornamental fruit woods can be used just like their bearing counterparts.
The info that I find says that chokecherry may produce a bitter taste. Look here under cherry-
http://www.smokingmeatforums.com/wiki/guide-for-woods-used-to-smoke-food
timmyt509, just out of curiosity how big is this tree that you are talking about?Cherry of all kinds is a very good flavor as long as you keep it to Thin Blue Smoke (TBS) just like all wood
As long as the aged wood is not mealy you're good to go. I wouldn't use the fresh wood just because there will be a lot of sap/moisture in it, and it will produce a lot of thick smoke.The chokecherry size is around 4"- 5" diameter and the length is probably 8-10'. There are several of them and I can also cut a few fresh ones.
Thing is, that list is not the "be all/end all" of smoking woods.There are many variables; time, temp etc.timmyt509, just out of curiosity how big is this tree that you are talking about?
In the 4+ years that I have been researching about and learning to cook BBQ I have seen the smoke wood list that I linked in my previous post many times.
http://www.thesmokering.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14774
http://www.texasbbqforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1346
http://www.eaglequest.com/~bbq/faq2/8.html
That this list has been propagated so widely leads me to believe that the information contained in it is believed to be valid by many authorities.
That chokecherry "may produce a bitter flavor" is seen as important to note by the author of this list should also be taken as a valid statement, at least until proven otherwise.
Has anyone ever used choke cherry as BBQ wood?
"may" simply introduces a caveat to smoking with chokecherry- it may produce a bitter taste. It is not meant to be an outright ban.With chokecherry the post says "may" introduce a bitter flavour. That word "may" doesn't sound definitive to me.
You also state that " should also be taken as a valid statement, at least until proven otherwise". Why? Should it not be taken as an invalid statement, until proven otherwise?
My apologies if my post came out sounding patronizing to your post. It was never meant that way."may" simply introduces a caveat to smoking with chokecherry- it may produce a bitter taste. It is not meant to be an outright ban.
The author intended this to be a valid statement, if you wish to disprove it you should start with the hypothesis "if you smoke meat with chokecherry wood, then the meat will have a bitter flavor" and attempt to disprove it experimentally.
All I am attempting to do is point out information in response to a question posed here, just as you are.