Boneless vs. Bone-in

  • Some of the links on this forum allow SMF, at no cost to you, to earn a small commission when you click through and make a purchase. Let me know if you have any questions about this.
SmokingMeatForums.com is reader supported and as an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.

kramerbr

Newbie
Original poster
Jun 13, 2012
10
10
South Dakota
I have to cook up about 60 lbs of boneless pork butts tomorrow for a contest.  Each one is about 20 lbs.  I was planning to split them in half to get more bark and shorten the cook time but I was wondering how the cook time compares to bone-in?  I've never done boneless before.

Thanks in advance!
 
Nope , My friend ,you're right , it does take longer , but as you and I both do , use the bone - in for the 'Love' boost.
drool.gif


The ( built -in) Thermometer feature is a great gift from the 'Smoke gods' .

But in rectrospect , cook your boneless Buts , cut down as mentioned ( even 5# if you have room ?) for extra Bark.   The same way you would  a bone - in . probe -  in and to 200*F or so . . .

Also . . .continue to watch for the dreaded "STALL" (Duh - tuh - duuuh  )
icon_eek.gif


have fun . . .
 
SmokingMeatForums.com is reader supported and as an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.

Latest posts

Hot Threads

Clicky