• Some of the links on this forum allow SMF, at no cost to you, to earn a small commission when you click through and make a purchase. Let me know if you have any questions about this.

General Stupid UDS Questions

SmokingMeatForums.com is reader supported and as an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.
I am going to resurect this post once again. Has anyone seen this web site? http://www.bigdrumsmokers.com/index.htm

On there they talk about cooking meat faster than on conventional smokers. Is this true with a UDS? Seems if you kept the temp at 225 it would be the same cook time as any smoker. I am not looking to speed anything up, I still crave low & slow!

OK Rick & Dave, have at it!
 
Yes, I have seen it. I think Rocky Richmond, the owner, is the one responsible for most of the pioneering design and testing that makes the UDS, which many consider a clone of his BDS, what it is today. Many of the "standard" features (if there are such things) as the 3 - 3/4" intakes and 8 - 1/2" holes for the exhaust are the result of his work. I'm not sure if he invented it or not but many of the people who have been making/using them for awhile seem to imitate him.

As far as it cooking faster, I think this is true because of the inherent design of the chamber. You've got a vertical chamber (heat rises), a relatively small chamber so the heat transfer to the meat is very effective, and a "direct heat" source although not too direct if you follow the "cooking grate 24" above the bottom of the coal basket' criteria.

It is a very efficient design for a cooker so there's not a lot of wasted heat or time. But don't worry, it ain't no microwave.
biggrin.gif
You'll still get "low and slow" Q when you cook with it. Plenty of time to enjoy some cool drinks and shoot the breeze while you're cooking.
PDT_Armataz_01_34.gif


Dave
 
The UDS does cook a bit faster than what the usual cooking times state. I did a 12lb brisket the other week and it took around 13 hrs. If we went by the usual 1.5 hour per lb it should have taken around 18 hrs. Then again I like to run my temps a bit higher @ 240 or so.
 
I'm with you there, Rick.
PDT_Armataz_01_34.gif
I think it does a better job rendering out the fat, among other things.

Dave
 
SmokingMeatForums.com is reader supported and as an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.
SmokingMeatForums.com is reader supported and as an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.

Latest posts

Back
Top
Clicky