- Jun 21, 2007
- 8,427
- 42
In a Purdue University classroom, they were discussing the qualifications to
be President of the United States. It was pretty simple the candidate must
be a natural born citizen of at least 35 years of age. However, one girl in
the class immediately started in on how unfair was the requirement to be a
natural born citizen. In short, her opinion was that this requirement
prevented many capable individuals from becoming president. The class was
taking it in and letting her rant, and not many jaws hit the floor when she
wrapped up her argument by stating "What makes a natural born citizen any
more qualified to lead this country than one born by C-section?"
be President of the United States. It was pretty simple the candidate must
be a natural born citizen of at least 35 years of age. However, one girl in
the class immediately started in on how unfair was the requirement to be a
natural born citizen. In short, her opinion was that this requirement
prevented many capable individuals from becoming president. The class was
taking it in and letting her rant, and not many jaws hit the floor when she
wrapped up her argument by stating "What makes a natural born citizen any
more qualified to lead this country than one born by C-section?"
