Not trying to start an argument here. I'm very much a rookie and will force myself to accept what I'm told.....given I can wrap my brain around it. In a recent post, I noted that I use a water pan to control temperature, and that I felt that it also added moisture to the meat. I saw responses that mentioned that meat comes with all of the moisture that it will ever have, and water pans don't add any more.
Now, I've heard discussions on this in the past, but have never heard any smoking guns pointing in either direction. What I don't understand is, if you can't add moisture to the meat, why do we spritz every hour and why does "beer can chicken" work. Are we adding moisture, or is it all about flavour in those examples.
I've used water pans for years. I cook a lot of chicken (mostly boneless, skinless breasts), and really do feel like I can tell a difference with and without the water pan.
If you don't mind educating a rookie, I'd really appreciate it.
Now, I've heard discussions on this in the past, but have never heard any smoking guns pointing in either direction. What I don't understand is, if you can't add moisture to the meat, why do we spritz every hour and why does "beer can chicken" work. Are we adding moisture, or is it all about flavour in those examples.
I've used water pans for years. I cook a lot of chicken (mostly boneless, skinless breasts), and really do feel like I can tell a difference with and without the water pan.
If you don't mind educating a rookie, I'd really appreciate it.