I hear a lot of talk of ribs that are "so tender they fall off the bone". My question is whether or not that is a desirable thing.
I'm well known for shunning Q chains, or for that matter, Q joints that cook in "set it and forget it" stainless cabinets that only burn 3 or 4 logs in the process of cooking a few hundred pounds of meat.
These are the types of places that, any and all, serve what we call "babyfood ribs", or, if you will, fallin' off the bone ribs.
We feel like ribs should be tender, but still retain the texture of real meat, or as they say, have a little "bite". Not bite as in spice or heat, but where you have to bite the meat off the bone. You shouldn't need to gnaw it off, but just a little texture.
That being said, I'm curious what the great majority thinks, and for that reason, here's the poll. To Bite or Not To Bite, that is the question.
Tim
I'm well known for shunning Q chains, or for that matter, Q joints that cook in "set it and forget it" stainless cabinets that only burn 3 or 4 logs in the process of cooking a few hundred pounds of meat.
These are the types of places that, any and all, serve what we call "babyfood ribs", or, if you will, fallin' off the bone ribs.
We feel like ribs should be tender, but still retain the texture of real meat, or as they say, have a little "bite". Not bite as in spice or heat, but where you have to bite the meat off the bone. You shouldn't need to gnaw it off, but just a little texture.
That being said, I'm curious what the great majority thinks, and for that reason, here's the poll. To Bite or Not To Bite, that is the question.
Tim