We just finished our second competition of the season and after looking at the scoresheets you really have to question the training some of the judges receive. The first 3 give you "9" for appearance the 4 gives a "6" Were the first 3 wrong or the 4th one wrong. This disparity in judging does nothing to encourage new teams to compete. By the time you're ready to start competition you have invested a fairly large sum of money into equipment and practice. It's very frustrating to see the scores come back this way. I would be interested to hear what some other teams think about this. I'm not crying the blues and will continue to compete but I would like to hear from some others.
post #1 of 2
5/24/10 at 8:57am