Pot smokers do it better.

  • Some of the links on this forum allow SMF, at no cost to you, to earn a small commission when you click through and make a purchase. Let me know if you have any questions about this.
SMF is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Haha!! Don't hold back, say what's on your mind. [emoji]128516[/emoji]
I agree on the bark, but folks round here seem to like the heavier bark so for those who do, the low and slow approach might suit their taste better. For me, the one I did Saturday pretty much checked all the boxes. Short cook time, light yet crispy and flavorful bark and tender,succulent, juicy meat. And I discovered I can get there without foiling.
 
Last edited:
Haha!! Don't hold back, say what's on your mind. [emoji]128516[/emoji]
I agree on the bark, but folks round here seem to like the heavier bark so for those who do, the low and slow approach might suit their taste better. For me, the one I did Saturday pretty much checked all the boxes. Short cook time, light yet crispy and flavorful bark and tender,succulent, juicy meat. And I discovered I can get there without foiling.
LOL.....i couldn't help it boat. 
biggrin.gif
   No disrespect intended.    Anytime i hear someone say L&S is better i gotta say something because i know better.  I  kinda cringe at the 225* area also because the smoke just isn't as good as quality of a burn....of course it depends on the smoker and how your fire is set up.

I don't even consider 300 H&F, it's more of a medium. Over 350 i'd consider hot and fast. 
 
SmokingMeatForums.com is reader supported and as an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying purchases.

Hot Threads

Clicky